Re: AaaarrrGGGH. linuxpluginrapper and linux-mozilla.

From: Gary Kline (kline_at_tao.thought.org)
Date: 10/11/05

  • Next message: Gary Kline: "Re: AaaarrrGGGH. linuxpluginwrapper and linux-mozilla."
    Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:20:35 -0700
    To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com>
    
    

    On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:55:02PM +0400, Andrew P. wrote:
    > On 10/11/05, Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> wrote:
    > > kldstat says that I have the linux stuff builtin. Thanks
    > > for your help; I'm de-/re-installing linux_base-8. Should
    > > be interesting.
    > >
    >
    > Shouldn't take more than a couple of minutes.
    >
    > > <SOAPBOX>
    > > The default of having these compat files installed in /usr
    > > rather than in /usr/local should probably be re-thought.
    > > I look for (most) ports in /usr/local. [A lot of the GUI
    > > suite are in /usr/X11R6/* tho.] hAving things symlinked
    > > shouldn't use up too many inodes.
    > > </SOAPBOX>
    > >
    >
    > Maybe you should reread hier(7) manpage. Personally
    > I honestly think that FreeBSD's directory layout is the
    > most carefully thought through one of all. You can't
    > symlink binary files from /usr/X11R6 to /compat/linux
    > /usr/X11R6, because they are in different binary formats.

            I would ln -s /compat/linux /usr/local
            so that people whp expect "ports" to install in
            /usr/local find the linux stuff there. Same thing
            for /usr/X11R6/* to /usr/local/*. The latter was
            dicusses ery brieflly several weeks ago. ....

    >
    > Also, please note that /usr/compat is just a temporary
    > solution, which exists until everybody recognizes the
    > total superiority of FreeBSD to other systems. 6.0
    > is starting the countdown towards FreeBSD 6.6.6,
    > which will conquer the world :-)
    >

            AMEN, brother!! (Wasn't 666 found to really be 626?)
            Oh, whatever....

            -g

    -- 
       Gary Kline     kline@thought.org   www.thought.org     Public service Unix
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Gary Kline: "Re: AaaarrrGGGH. linuxpluginwrapper and linux-mozilla."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: AaaarrrGGGH. linuxpluginrapper and linux-mozilla.
      ... Maybe you should reread hiermanpage. ... I honestly think that FreeBSD's directory layout is the ... symlink binary files from /usr/X11R6 to /compat/linux ... total superiority of FreeBSD to other systems. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: malformed man pages
      ... The 1mtar 22marchive format collects any number of files, ... That looks sort of like malformed ANSI escape codes (bold would be "ESC ... then we know the problem is with the manpage tools. ... Does the less need to be patched in FreeBSD? ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: ports include /etc/src.conf? i.e. graphics/libfpx
      ... For example, libreoffice "knows" out of the box, that FreeBSD has ... The src.conf manpage is not in error. ... I'm not an expert with the build system, and that goes double for ports, ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: I like Ubuntu
      ... provides better manpage coverage than FreeBSD, ... Stallman liking infopages but Debian-ites having to create a manpage:). ... Debian shows a warning in the SEE ALSO section: ... % The full documentation for mv is maintained as a Texinfo ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: math.h (Header) xxx (Bibliothek)
      ... In diese Fall ist FreeBSD einiges besser als Linux. ... Jahren hatte ich auch das gleiche Problem: ... In der Manpage stand nichts dazu. ...
      (de.comp.lang.c)