Re: backup strategies
From: Csaba Henk (csaba-ml_at_creo.hu)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- In reply to: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- Next in thread: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- Reply: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:09:02 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:40:16AM -0600, Eric Schuele wrote:
> How do snapshots work and how do they provide the consistency necessary
> for a dump?
[...]
>
> SoftUpdates are required on the filesystem.
This sounds beautiful. I am amazed. I knew of softupdates, but they were
always a shady corner of my understanding of BSD.
So live fs dumping is based on the great hackery of softupdates. Fine,
but in this case... shouldn't the man page make a mention of it?
It just says that -L is ignored in case of unmounted/ro mounted fs-s,
or if there is no proper .snap dir. But it doesn't say that it will be
ignored if softupdates is not turned on...
Going a bit off: which OS-es provide this live snapshot dumping
capability? FreeBSD? FreeBSD >= 5.x ? *BSD ? Maybe something else?
(AFAIK, softupdates is supported also in other members of the BSD
family, yet the NetBSD dump manpage didn't have such a -L flag...)
-- Csaba Henk My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd. Please don't take it personal. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- In reply to: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- Next in thread: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- Reply: Eric Schuele: "Re: backup strategies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|