Re: iSCSI support
From: Alex Zbyslaw (xfb52_at_dial.pipex.com)
Date: 11/22/05
- Previous message: Louis LeBlanc: "Re: Project Management Software"
- In reply to: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: iSCSI support"
- Next in thread: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: iSCSI support"
- Reply: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: iSCSI support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:39:36 +0000 To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net>
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> Whole devices accessed directly can be a lot faster than NFS, since the
>> client doesn't have to constantly ask the NFS server whether the file
>> it's currently accessing has changed.
>
>
> any problem to add such option to NFS?? with iSCSI you just CAN't do it.
> anyway this asking isn't bandwidth intensive, while adds delays. and
> it may affect of transfer speed for ONE process reading one file, but
> not multiuser system.
Regardless of whether iSCSI is any good, it's a common access method for
SAN devices, and from what I've been told, may be the *only* access
method. So in heterogenous (read windows dominated) environment where
you want to be able to access these things, an iSCSI initiator for
FreeBSD can only be a good thing.
--Alex
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Louis LeBlanc: "Re: Project Management Software"
- In reply to: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: iSCSI support"
- Next in thread: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: iSCSI support"
- Reply: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: iSCSI support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|