Re: Opinions Wanted: Dell PowerEdge Servers ... ?

Greg Barniskis wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:

Second that. They're not as good as in the past, but we have had hardware assistance on a FreeBSD-driven server on the condition of proving hardware fault using Dell's own bootable diagnostics.

Also, it seems like "YMMV" definitely applies to Dell, generally. We find that their higher end desktops (mainly Optiplex), higher end laptops and PowerEdge servers to be pretty solid and well-supported.

However, our support experience may be artificially "enhanced" compared to others because we buy off a large govt. contract. We do not talk to the same support group that most other posters have grumbled about. That said, our overall experience with Dell support has actually been as good or better than with many other vendors.

From time to time we're confronted with a 1st tier "non-help" desk operator (scripted responses, incapable of deviating from script or otherwise actually helping), but we find that it's not too difficult to escalate around those individuals and actually get help.

I've been more than a little surprised to hear the uniformly negative reports on Dell hardware and support. Since they've been from people who have loads more experience than I have, I tend to respect them. However, I have to agree wtih Greg, our experience has been uniformly positive. Personally I only admin a handful of boxes, but they're mostly Dells with a couple of Sun's running AMD64 processors. I haven't noticed any appreciable difference in the layout or labeling, but perhaps my eye isn't as keen as some who've handled hundreds and hundreds of machines.

One thing I do know is Dell's first tier support for servers is worthless, but as Greg says, you just need to establish that you know what you're doing, and you can bypass them.

However, if you're running a big shop, maybe Dell should be avoided. We only have a little over a hundred or so, mostly running Windows. (We run Sun Sparcs on the *nix* side of the house, except for me. I run exclusively FreeBSD.)

--
Paul Schmehl (pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Time for a new server
    ... had to do this and I'm very out of touch with the hardware market. ... We've used Dell in the past, and comparing the Dell and IBM machines ... servers. ...
    (uk.comp.os.linux)
  • Re: Fujitsu Siemens Primepower
    ... > we are currently looking into buying new hardware, ... Does anybody have recent experiences with these servers? ... The SPARC64V do support VIS: ... Sun Microsystems sun4us Fujitsu Siemens ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Upgrading to Windows Server 2008
    ... You can do an in place upgrade, but beware, there isn't much hardware ... support for old hardware (I ended upgrading Dell 2650 in the lab). ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Time for a new server
    ... had to do this and I'm very out of touch with the hardware market. ... We've used Dell in the past, and comparing the Dell and IBM machines ... servers. ... has been one in a dual PSU box... ...
    (uk.comp.os.linux)
  • Re: Solaris and Linux comparison
    ... > I don't care about 10-year reliability, ... > PRIMEPOWER SPARC Solaris servers, but as far as I know Sun doesn't ... >> its hardware built and sold with the finest of razor thin margins, ... > last cheap Dell server that I bought had a disk failure soon after ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)