Re: Questions on EXT3 vs standard BSD partitions
- From: albi <albi@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:03:44 +0200
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:44:21 -0400
"Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have to move between BSD and Linux on one system quite a bit, and I
was wondering if there were any reasons to avoid EXT3 on a filesystem
(such as /dev/ad0s1), as opposed to using the more standard BSD setups
(such as UFS on /dev/ad0s1a)? I'm thinking mostly in terms of
reliability, but also in terms of flexibility and speed.
Is there anything that should absolutely stay in UFS (such as /boot?)
as a side-note :
last time i used an ext3 usb-disc on FreeBSD 5.4 there was still a
problem with automatically unmounting at a shutdown/reboot leaving the
ext3-filesystem "dirty", and could not be mounted after the reboot
until a fsck was done, haven't tried this with 6.x yet
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Questions on EXT3 vs standard BSD partitions
- From: Jim Stapleton
- Questions on EXT3 vs standard BSD partitions
- Prev by Date: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda
- Next by Date: Re: Wire pickups.
- Previous by thread: Questions on EXT3 vs standard BSD partitions
- Next by thread: Re: Need Free BSD's company description ASAP, Linuxworld SF06 Show Guide Deadline has passed. ATTN: Matt Olender
- Index(es):