Re: batching port builds
- From: Kevin Kinsey <kdk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:25:57 -0500
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said:
If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset defaults for each port with options. Or you can do 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for the port in whose directory you're currently in and all its dependencies.
See 'man ports' for more information.
To use those with 'portupgrade -a' will probably take some custom scripting.
Ah, so there's no make.conf option for this?
?? You can even set BATCH=yes in your environment. I'm
pretty sure you can in make.conf, also, but IIRC you might
not want to do that . . .
Kevin Kinsey
--
What the large print giveth, the small print taketh away.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- batching port builds
- From: Michael P. Soulier
- Re: batching port builds
- From: David J Brooks
- Re: batching port builds
- From: Michael P. Soulier
- batching port builds
- Prev by Date: Re: batching port builds
- Next by Date: Re: batching port builds
- Previous by thread: Re: batching port builds
- Next by thread: Re: batching port builds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
