Re: SMP detection
- From: "Jordi Carrillo" <jordilin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:02:52 +0200
2006/8/31, Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
the gnome system monitor (Applications->System Tools->System Monitor) only
Michal Mertl wrote:
> No! Kernel threads (e.g. handling interrupts) aren't that much different
> to normal processes.
>
> Logical CPUs on a single HTT capable CPU share most of the CPU logic,
> especially all the external stuff (handling interrupts). Scheduling
> handling of interrupts on the "secondary/logical" core wouldn't
> probably help performance at all (if that is at all possible).
>
Could you clarify note 20031022 in /usr/src/UPDATING? It states that HTT
CPUs are used for interrupts if they are detected, even if they aren't
used by regular processes. Was this something that just showed up in
pre-6.x releases?
--
-- Skylar Thompson (skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
-- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/
Another question that's wondering me is why FreeBSD with the SMP kernel
shows one CPU when Linux with a SMP kernel shows two CPUs
--
http://jordilin.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- SMP detection
- From: Jordi Carrillo
- Re: SMP detection
- From: backyard
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Jordi Carrillo
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Skylar Thompson
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Michal Mertl
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Skylar Thompson
- SMP detection
- Prev by Date: Re: Mounting Linux Procfs at Boot
- Next by Date: Mirroring: gvinum or gmirror?
- Previous by thread: Re: SMP detection
- Next by thread: Re: SMP detection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|