Re: SMP detection
- From: Michal Mertl <mime@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:38:46 +0200
Skylar Thompson wrote:
Michal Mertl wrote:
No! Kernel threads (e.g. handling interrupts) aren't that much different
to normal processes.
Logical CPUs on a single HTT capable CPU share most of the CPU logic,
especially all the external stuff (handling interrupts). Scheduling
handling of interrupts on the "secondary/logical" core wouldn't
probably help performance at all (if that is at all possible).
Could you clarify note 20031022 in /usr/src/UPDATING? It states that HTT
CPUs are used for interrupts if they are detected, even if they aren't
used by regular processes. Was this something that just showed up in
pre-6.x releases?
I think it means that if an interrupt would for some reason be signalled
to the unused logical core it wouldn't be lost or something.
Michal
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- SMP detection
- From: Jordi Carrillo
- Re: SMP detection
- From: backyard
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Jordi Carrillo
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Skylar Thompson
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Michal Mertl
- Re: SMP detection
- From: Skylar Thompson
- SMP detection
- Prev by Date: firefox starts up always in the first virtual screen in XFCE
- Next by Date: Re: not adding daemons to rc.conf
- Previous by thread: Re: SMP detection
- Next by thread: Re: SMP detection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|