Re: solaris
- From: White Hat <pigskin_referee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
--- Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/09/06, White Hat <pigskin_referee@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<pigskin_referee@xxxxxxxxx>
--- Freminlins <freminlins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/09/06, White Hat
itwrote:
I have
tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says,
notis
just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is
close...even
close.
True, but also compare the cost. Not even
is
Immaterial. the singularly most important feature
suitability to task. If it is free and it does not
work, what good is it?
In what way does it "not work"? It's enough for many
people, so why should
they pay more?
I never said that anyone should pay more. I simply
said that it was not suitable for the tasks that both
I, and primarily my wife, use it for. Again, the price
of an object is secondary to its usefulness. At the
very least it has to be compared against it.
He/she doeshours
not want to read tons of manuals and spend
forin a
frustrating attempt to get it to run.
This is where you are completely wrong. I work
toan ISP. I'm not
responsible for tech support but I keep my "ear
Outlookthe ground". A VERY large
number of callers have problems configuring
oftenExpress, for example. No
matter what the polls say, the experience is
itvery different. They may
not read the manuals (because they are no longer
supplied), they just ring a
call centre instead.
Yes, the lack of documentation is a shame. Usually
can be obtained for an additonal cost which Isuppose
is better than nothing. The same lack ofdocumentation
plagues every facet of software today. Of course,it
has been a boon for the after market book manualcalled
publishers. BTW, you have failed to document so
help line assistants who are nothing more thancompany
mouth pieces who have at most a superficialknowledge
of the product that they are suppose to beassistant a
customer with. I had the experience of talkingwith a
customer support moron who tried to sell me a newOutlook
router while I attempted to explain the router was
fine, but the installation CD was defective. I
eventually just sent it back for a replacement.
Usually these individuals are barely equipped to
handle the job they are given.
However, you have made my point. If a user cannot
decipher how to configure a simple thing like
Express, and there are programs available thatwill do
it for them, then how are they suppose to becapable
of handling a CLI OS like FreeBSD? It boggles themind
-- at least mine. Worse, the configuration of OEis
handled by a wizard. It is truly sad when a userdown
cannot configure something when it is simplified
to that level.
So on the one hand you think that for the sake of
the morons FreeBSD should
made into something other than "a CLI OS" (which if
you put KDE or GNOME on
it it already is, btw), and on the other hand you
despise the morons who
can't even use a wizard?
I never inferred that FBSD should evolve into
anything. It performs quite nicely as a CLI. Printing
is not all that great, and the use of many devices
such as web cams can prove to be a chore to install,
but that has more to due with the creators of those
devices and lack thereof of proper drivers, etc. Even
devices that do work are not always fully supported.
Again, most likely the device creators are not
supporting the device under FreeBSD, or any other OS
except win32. Again, it is all about monetary return.
I cannot blame them, I like to eat too.
Furthermore, I never said I despise anyone, except
perhaps pseudo technical help employees. However, even
they have to eat. I stated that it was a sad day when
someone could not ever configure OE, even when
assisted with a wizard. I think it is rather obvious
that these individuals would not be the target market
for FBSD.
The average useror
does not care about configuring firewall, AV
way.Spyware, etc. Just drop in a copy of ZA withperhaps
Sunbelt's Counter Spy and they are on their
fine
That's one statement contradicting the other.
How? Drop in two CDs or download the programs, run
them and case closed. Neither one requires any
significant configuration. The defaults work just
for most users. You could eliminate the CounterSpy
since ZA has its own proprietary SpyWare program,but
I just happen to prefer Counter Spy.
A decent router does not "require any significant
configuration" either,
despite the fact that it should include a firewall.
And if you use a
router/firewall, you shouldn't need to configure a
firewall on your
desktop/server either.
The key word here is 'significant'. That varies by
user to user. I believe that the use of an internal
firewall might very well be dictated by a users LAN
configuration. I only have four units networked
together, with only one avenue to the Internet, so
perhaps I don't need an extensive internal firewall.
However, I am sure that many users do. In any case, a
router is not an AV/SpyWare detection and elimination
program.
BTW, if MS actually does market it 'One Care'
program
suite, that might even obsolete that entireprocess. I
don't think they will offer it with the OS though.Too
much of a chance the government will protest.to
Personally I believe a company should be allowed
market its product anyway it wants withoutgovernment
intervention; however, that is entirely anotherstory.
That's a good idea. And I should be able to procure
products and settle
scores anyway I want without government
intervention, too. </sarcasm>
Way out of line. No where did I even suggest the idea
of retribution. I assume that is what you are
referring to by "settle scores". I believe that within
a few carefully crafted guidelines perhaps, a
developer should be free to create and offer for sale,
distribution, give it away free for all I car
(FreeBSD) any item that they so desire. Let the market
decide whether or not the item if of any value.
Furthermore, I never mentioned 'procure' in my
statement. That is your own concoction. I am dead set
fascism, socialism or any other type of 'ism' you want
to infer when it comes to the freedom of creating and
marketing. Obviously, with a few carefully crafted
regulation; i.e., say of prescription drugs,
explosives -- things like that. I don't want to get
involved with basic economy 101 here however.
--
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: solaris
- From: Jeff Rollin
- Re: solaris
- References:
- Re: solaris
- From: Jeff Rollin
- Re: solaris
- Prev by Date: Re: can i build more than one world on a buildserver?
- Next by Date: Re: solaris
- Previous by thread: Re: solaris
- Next by thread: Re: solaris
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|