Re: kldunload -f has no effect
- From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:59:18 +0200
usleepless@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Kamikaze,
On 10/16/06, [LoN]Kamikaze <LoN_Kamikaze@xxxxxx> wrote:
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram with my
thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled). Unfortunately,
despite the
claims of the manpage the '-f' flag does not alter the behaviour of the
kldunload tool. How do I get drm unloaded?
are you sure you drm is loaded as a module instead of compiled into your
kernel?
Yes I'm certain, it's listed by kldstat after all. Also if I deactivate dri, it doesn't get loaded and I can suspend/resume just fine. If I suspend with dri enabled, the system resumes, but as soon as I switch back to X, X hangs (and shows random screen garbage). The rest of the system still works, though. I can ssh into the box and work on it, as if nothing happened. Only if I try to kill X, the whole system will stop responding.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- kldunload -f has no effect
- From: [LoN]Kamikaze
- Re: kldunload -f has no effect
- From: usleepless
- kldunload -f has no effect
- Prev by Date: Re: What's so compelling about FreeBSD?
- Next by Date: Re: What's so compelling about FreeBSD?
- Previous by thread: Re: kldunload -f has no effect
- Next by thread: Teletronics wlan 200mW card supported under 5.x?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|