Re: cvs
- From: Ceri Davies <ceri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:15:49 +0100
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:12:54PM +0200, pobox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
You're wrong. It's the other way around:
We are *forced* to use CVSup, because CVS is centralized, without
any other good way to mirror changesets to a distributed network of
mirrors, users and developer workspaces.
On the other hand, SVN is centralized too :-)
What I wanted to say is that FreeBSD will remain for the time being, on
cvs - is that correct?
Until we're happy with another tool and have reasons that make moving
worth the effort, we'll stay with CVS.
This is /not/ because of the CVSup infrastructue though, which is
essentially good at throwing arbitrary filesets around and doesn't tie
us to CVS.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
Attachment:
pgpIXq7KLeuvO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: two NIC and nfs
- Next by Date: Re: pkg_add/delete questions
- Previous by thread: Re: cvs
- Next by thread: POP before SMTP with TCPSERVER
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
