Re: hardware mirrors recognized as individual disks in fbsd

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:33:47AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
I'm tired of win2k crashing, and we won't even go into my opinion of vista's
strongarm marketing tactics (read: changing my hardware means I have to pay
again? they can keep their OS).

Problem is, I've got 320GB of accumulated detrius on ntfs volumes to
migrate. I see there is some good r/w ports for ntfs, so I'm willing to
evaluate that to see if it's stable (shoestring budget here obviously - this
is my personal stuff only).

Forging ahead, I get ready to start playing the mounting game, but
lo-and-behold, suddenly I have 4 disks whereas in windows I had two. Now I
praise FreeBSD for it's superior intellect here, but now I have a problem.
I want two 160GB mirrored volumes, not 4 unmirrored ones. The RAID is an
ASUS P5DR1-VM motherboard with a ULI raid chipset onboard. Very nice setup
for the money.

Is this normal? Am I going to break my mirror if I mount a single disk? If
so, how do I mount a mirror?

Thanks,
Steve

--
Steve Franks, KE7BTE
Staff Engineer
La Palma Devices, LLC
http://www.lapalmadevices.com
(520) 312-0089

It sounds like your onboard RAID chip is either not supported, or the
appropriate driver is not being loaded. Can you post the output of
dmesg?

Also, be aware that you may not really have a hardware RAID chip.
Many (most?) times the onboard chips simply make multiple disks look
like a single LUN to the operating system; they also require driver
support. Real hardware RAID chips/cards tend to be expensive,
proprietary, don't require an OS driver and include a battery backup
system for data in the RAID cache should the system lose power.

You may want to read up on gmirror.

-Damian

ps. I've got at least a half-dozen different x86 system boards that
include these crappy RAID chips from vendors like nVidia, Intel,
Adaptec, LSI, etc. Typically you get closed-source, Windows-only
driver support.

pps. If you do want real hardware RAID support under FreeBSD, I've had
great experiences with the Promise arrays (m500 and m300) and
one of the PCI cards (I'd have to check on the exact model).
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • processes hung in D (raid5/dm/ext3)
    ... The kernel is 2.6.7-rc3-bk4 with 2 patches: ... The raid array and PV/VG/LVs were created under 2.6.5 with the 32/64 ... # ACPI Support ... # Generic Driver Options ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [PATCH] tracing/ftrace: stop {irqs,preempt}soff tracers when tracing is stopped
    ... Hardware name: System Product Name ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # AX.25 network device drivers ... # Generic Driver Options ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Binary Drivers
    ... "Thank you for requesting a driver to support our hardware on ... Linux market is not big enough to justify the work, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: hardware question: Intel entry server board SE7221BK1 & Fedora Core 3
    ... > The advantage of such a nice community base is, ... > of compatible and non-compatible hardware for Fedora. ... So especially is SATA problem free with the chipset - the RAID ... > security update kernel come out more frequently than such driver updates ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: DVI output, ATI or nVidia
    ... complaining that a vendor refuses to give full documentation for a piece ... of hardware do its work a mater of trace secrets. ... were no OSS 3d driver. ... Support for operating systems not supported by NVidia (any PowerPC ...
    (Fedora)