Re: 6.2: "upgrade", or just "install" and restore rc.conf?
- From: Eric <heli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:54:49 -0600
Steve Franks wrote:
Presuming you have a 1 or 2 user system, and haven't done alot ofupgrade is super easy. on a more or less stock system, it should be very straightforward.
mods, is there any reason to "upgrade" to 6.2 as opposed to just
"install" it? Of the maybe 10 files I've modified, I have backed them
up elsewhere, and it's fresh in my mind still. The only issues I can
think of are (1) users/groups (of which I again have a whopping 2),
and
(2) installed packages - this could be a problem, as I have no idea
how we (the os) "know" what's installed, and that info may or may not
be deleted on a new install.
(3) sysinstall/label doesn't seem happy about putting things on an
existing slice(s) - when I fubared my 6.1 install it complained about
insufficient space until I deleted all slices on the disk.
Anyone care to comment on pros/cons of install vs. upgrade? Seems
this is a relevant time for the discussion.
its good practice and fun too! =)
Eric
i have instructions on my site should you want a step by step guide. Goto mikestammer.com and then the freebsd section if you are interested
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- 6.2: "upgrade", or just "install" and restore rc.conf?
- From: Steve Franks
- 6.2: "upgrade", or just "install" and restore rc.conf?
- Prev by Date: 6.2: "upgrade", or just "install" and restore rc.conf?
- Next by Date: Re: Sorta OT - Backup solutions Mac to FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: 6.2: "upgrade", or just "install" and restore rc.conf?
- Next by thread: Re: 6.2: "upgrade", or just "install" and restore rc.conf?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|