Re: 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:27:27 -0500
Sergio Lenzi writes:
> > However, the 4.x binaries want to find libc.so.3, which
> > doesn't seem to be anywhere around.
> >
> > Anyone know the trick to getting this to work?
>
> /usr/ports/misc/compat4x ?
or as a workaround
add in the /etc/libmap.conf
libc.so.3 libc.so
libm.so.3 libm.so
......
that is every shared library it complains add it to
the /etc/libmap.conf
That can work.
On the other hand, there's no guarantee the ABI - never mind
the internal operation - of any function will remain constant across
a major version bump. (As far as I know.)
The safe way is to update/rebuild against current libs;
failing that, to install the compat?x package.
Robert Huff
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- References:
- 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- From: Thomas David Rivers
- 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- From: Robert Huff
- Re: 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- From: Sergio Lenzi
- 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- Prev by Date: Re: UFS2 Snapshot limitiations
- Next by Date: Re: No matter what I try I can't get Nvidia 3d acceleration to work. Please help!
- Previous by thread: Re: 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- Next by thread: Re: 6.2 running 4.x binaries (missing libc.so.3)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|