Re: About file systems and formats

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:25:57PM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:

Yesterday while working on a problem at work, a colleague and I were talking
about the various file systems and something that I have always wondered on
is what are the various file systems doing when a format is being done. For
example, at home, my PC has 2 80gb drives. One for Windows and the other
for FreeBSD. It took Windows nearly an hour (give or take) to format the
80gb drive. On the other hand, it took FreeBSD little more than 3 - 5
minutes to format its 80gb drive.


Both drives are similar in capability. They are both 7200 rpm drives, etc.
So what is so much different about NTFS from FFS? Are the file systems
really that different that MS's system is simply dog slow, or is the format
for FreeBSD skipping some "integrity" checks on the surface of the drive or
whatever (this assumes that the MS install process is actually doing this).
Please understand, I intend only to find the answer to the question with
this. I'm looking for starting a "war" about who's file system rocks more
than the other. The idea of an integrity check was just speculation between
my colleague and I because there such a speed difference in formatting
things (once windows is installed) when choosing between a "Quick Format" or
a "Full Format".

Unix systems such as FreeBSD do not usually do an actual 'format' in the
way we used to think of Format. When you do a newfs on a FreeBSD partition
it is creating a filesystem by writing file system tables and copies of
those tables in specific places across the partition. It makes use of
the low level format that is already put there by the manufacturer.
I don't really know how much of that MS does when it builds an NTFS
file system.

////jerry


Can someone here offer some in depth information on this for me? Thanks.

Andy

P.S. on a side note, but related to this, in what directories under the
system sources will I find the source code for the FFS used by FreeBSD, and
how are those modules structured?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: About file systems and formats
    ... > is what are the various file systems doing when a format is being done. ... It took Windows nearly an hour to format ... seconds on 250 GB drives, so 3-5 minutes you got is way too much. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Mac UFS partition unreadable
    ... > I use both mac and freebsd and would like to have the abbility to use my ... > format it. ... MS-DOS FAT32 will support large drives and long filenames, ...
    (freebsd-hackers)
  • Re: [SLE] New install while keeping /home
    ... - Is selecting the mount point of /home to point to my home partition ... during install enough? ... is generally not to format. ... simply list what file systems are on each physical disk/partition. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: About file systems and formats
    ... is what are the various file systems doing when a format is being done. ... It took Windows nearly an hour to format the ... seconds on 250 GB drives, so 3-5 minutes you got is way too much. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: [SLE] New install while keeping /home
    ... - Is selecting the mount point of /home to point to my home ... for existing partitions is generally not to format. ... or simply list what file systems are on each physical ...
    (SuSE)