Re: AMD64



On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:41:46PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Michael S <msherman77@xxxxxxxxx>:

I am getting my (first) Athlon 64 x 2 today or
tomorrow and was wondering whether I should stick with
the reliable x86 or try the AMD64 port.

Any performance penalties when running x86 FreeBSD on
a 64-bit machine?

Performance is equivalent, except in a few corner cases. Keep in mind that
there are some cases where amd64 is actually slower, so it's really a wash,
unless you know you're specific application will benefit from 64 bit.

Also what are the common problems, i.e. drivers,
applications that are known not to work under the
AMD64. This is going to be a desktop/workstation type
system.

Personally, I would stick with i386, unless you like to experiment. Last
time I tried to run amd64 on a desktop, I had lots of trouble with misc
problems here and there. Same machine running i386 is rock stable with
no problems. My gut tells me that a lot of desktop apps and libraries
aren't really mature from a 64-bit standpoint yet.

I've been running amd64 on my desktop since 5.3 without any real
problems. But I only picked hardware that had drivers available.

Some things to keep in mind:
1) no binary nvidia graphics driver
2) no flash plugin
3) java is cumbersome.
4) no win32 codecs for mplayer

ad 1) I've got a Radeon 9250 that's supported by the native Xorg & DRI
driver, so no problem. I don't like binary-only drivers anyway.

ad 2) So no annoying flash ads either. :-) I can live with that.

ad 3) I don't use it anyway.

ad 4) Works fine without them, AFAICT.

Stuff like emacs, firefox, gimp, sane, imagemagick, audacious and
mplayer all work fine. I haven't tried openoffice, bacause it's huge
with lots of dependencies and I prefer LaTeX anyway.

Roland
--
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)

Attachment: pgpJrzljw9K5c.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386
    ... > can't get nv to work under amd64:. ... > We should band together and get nvidia to speed up amd64 ... bear in mind that Xorg does not support any recent AMD cards (X1300 ... The open source drivers ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386
    ... > can't get nv to work under amd64:. ... > We should band together and get nvidia to speed up amd64 ... bear in mind that Xorg does not support any recent AMD cards (X1300 ... The open source drivers ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: XP 64-bit
    ... Your device drivers also need to be 64-bit (AMD64) to run under Windows XP ... You must get the AMD64 Windows XP drivers off your SATA drive manufacturer. ... > DRIVER INSTALL FOR HIGH CAPACITY DRIVES. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: FreeBSD 7 and ESXi
    ... kernel can't even load. ... |working amd64 nVidia drivers). ... without building a custom kernel with PAE support (and there are ... |known compatibility problems between PAE and certain kernel drivers). ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Can someone confirm this for me?
    ... >> I'm wanting to install SuSe on an AMD64 and was told that it does ... > just have to be sure you get the 64-bit release of SuSE. ... No 32-bit drivers will work on AMD64, ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)