Re: freebsd / gateway / parental control
- From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:24:40 -0700
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:07 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
I use squid and dansguardian. Very easy to setup.
/usr/ports/www/dansguardian
I have never tried squid but it seems quite a big package. I have also
seen oops but not sure which to choose. Basically, will squid not be an
overkill for a family network consisting of 3-4 machines? The box I want
to devote for gateway/pc purposes is a Compaq PIII 866 Mhz with 512 MB RAM
and 40GB HD.
Squid works just fine for a single-user environment, even, especially if you use an adblocker and/or override the local DNS for annoying adfarm sites to return just a transparent 1x1 pixel GIF image instead of the ads. Squid is noticeably smarter about figuring out when to recheck web resources for changes and do so efficiently compared to pretty much all of the local caching done by browsers.
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: freebsd / gateway / parental control
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: freebsd / gateway / parental control
- From: Dantavious
- Re: freebsd / gateway / parental control
- Prev by Date: Re: svn+ssh over nonstandard port fails to connect
- Next by Date: Re: mdconfig using malloc()
- Previous by thread: Re: freebsd / gateway / parental control
- Next by thread: Qlogic 2432, Multipath, Dynamic LUNs, and NTFS
- Index(es):