Re: Nano issue
- From: Reid Linnemann <lreid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:12:00 -0500
Written by RW on 08/02/07 15:02>>
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:11:04 -0500
Reid Linnemann <lreid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Written by RW on 08/02/07 11:27>>On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:15:35 -0400I'm tracking 6-STABLE, and I only have /lib/libncurses.so.6. libcursesw.so.6 is listed as part of the compat6x port, perhaps
r17fbsd@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
At 07:25 AM 8/2/2007, Roberth Sjonøy wrote:but do you have libncursesw.so.6 - note the 'w'Hello, Ive just installed my prefered text editor, nano, but when im going to run nano, this just appears:I have nano 2.0.6 installed from packages (not ports) and it works
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libncursesw.so.6" not found , required by "nano"
fine on 6.2.
I also have that library with the same date as my last buildworld:
$ ls -l /lib/*curs*
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 268108 Jan 14 2007 /lib/libncurses.so.6
The most likely scenario is that he's trying to use a 6-stable
package on 6.2. This something that people tend to get away with,
but is not actually supported.
Either build the port or install the correct package.
Roberth has installed a 7-CURRENT package built with compat6x?
I'm guessing your 6-STABLE wasn't synced all that recently. There's a
test in the nano makefile that make it use the wide (multi-byte
character) version of curses (ie libncursesw) if the 6-stable or
7-current version is sufficiently recent. The fact that an up-to-date
compat6x has libncursesw.so.6 tends to confirm this.
Yes, you are right. I hadn't synced since February.. my, how the time flies!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Nano issue
- From: Roberth Sjonøy
- Re: Nano issue
- From: r17fbsd
- Re: Nano issue
- From: RW
- Re: Nano issue
- From: Reid Linnemann
- Re: Nano issue
- From: RW
- Nano issue
- Prev by Date: UFS and spreading data
- Next by Date: Re: Firewall rules / Proper directory
- Previous by thread: Re: Nano issue
- Next by thread: Re: Nano issue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|