Re: problems with networking...

"Michael Hawkins" <cypheros@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

oops, sorry about the -m, lack of sleep and alll....
/etc/rc.conf:
amd_enable="YES"
hostname=[Removed]
ifconfig_vr0="DHCP"
inetd_enable="YES"
rpcbind_enable="YES"
sshd_enable="YES"
usbd_enable="YES"

#netstat -rn
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 10.11.12.254 UGS 0 24 vr0
10.11.12/24 link#1 UC 0 0 vr0
10.11.12.254 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 2 37 vr0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 8 lo0



......for some reason I don't think that MAC addy of all f's is a good
thing, but this is the first I've seen of it..

No, it's not. The output of arp -an might be helpful to this,
but I suspect you've got an underlying network issue.

Also (for the second time) keep the mailing list in the loop.
In particular, I'll be leaving shortly and won't have access to
email for several days.


On 8/18/07, Bill Moran <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


[Please keep the mailing list in the CC]

"Michael Hawkins" <cypheros@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Certainly. Here it is:
#ifconfig -a
vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST ,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 10.11.12.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.11.12.254

That's really strange. Your broadcast address should be
10.11.12.255. It's quite likely that this is part of your
problem, but I can't imagine how you could have arrived at
this configuration. What is in /etc/rc.conf?

ether [MAC ADDRESS REMOVED]
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
statusL active
plip0: flags=108810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT> mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING ,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000


#netstat -m
65/205/270 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
64/134/198/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
0/128 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clisters in use (current/cache/total/max)
0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)0/0/0/0 16k
jumbo
clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
144k/319k/463k bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
0/4/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
0 requests for sfbufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed
0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
0 calls to protocol drain routines

That's netstat -rn, not -m. Unfortunately, the -m doesn't tell me
what I'm looking for, which is your routing table.

I'm wondering if your ipnat rules are awry. Please provide the
ifconfig, routing table, and nat rules from the router machine.

...again, this is straight out of a fresh install (which I did because I
had
the exact same problem with the last install).

Well, obviously, you did it the same both times, and are getting the
same result.

On 8/18/07, Bill Moran <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Michael Hawkins" < cypheros@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sorry if this is sorta n00bish, but I have a problem that Google
hasn't
answered for me yet...
I have a moderately-sized network that I am trying to run, with
about 70
or
so machines on it. The DHCP server (running FreeBSD 6.2, IPv4
address:
10.11.12.254, Subnet is 10.11.12.0/24 ) acts as a gateway server as
well,
and
has ipnat running for traffic routing.

So far, I have had no problems with ANY of the machines on this
network
connecting, save one--my File server (running FreeBSD 6.2 as well,
IPv4
address: 10.11.12.253). For some reason, whenever I try to
establish
any
connection to ANY network address (on any protocol), it will only
connect to
one address: 10.11.12.252 (and won't connect to anything when that
machine
is off).
Here is a ping listing:
#ping 10.11.12.254
PING 10.11.12.254 (10.11.12.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.11.12.252: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.852 ms


...and it continues precisely in that manner until I stop it.

I have tried re-installing the OS on the file server, but with no
change
in
results. I have removed the machine at 10.11.12.252 with the only
change
being that the file-server can obtain NO connection to ANY IP
address.

Any help would be appreciated.

Why don't your cut/paste the output of ifconfig -a and netstat -rn

I suspect your network settings are incorrect.

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023











--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

****************************************************************
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information
and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of
this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual
responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended
recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a
result of e-mail transmission.
****************************************************************










--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

****************************************************************
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information
and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of
this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual
responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended
recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a
result of e-mail transmission.
****************************************************************
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: problems with networking...
    ... which is your routing table. ... This message contains confidential information ... this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual ... result of e-mail transmission. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Not sure about...
    ... int main{ ... This message contains confidential information and is ... message is not an intended recipient (or the individual ... result of e-mail transmission. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • em interrupt storm
    ... but I'm looking for pointers to keep me from doing random upgrades or ... This message contains confidential information and is ... message is not an intended recipient (or the individual ... result of e-mail transmission. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: php dependency hell
    ... You should be able to use portupgrade with the -o option to replace ... This message contains confidential information and is ... message is not an intended recipient (or the individual ... result of e-mail transmission. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • bce issues still outstanding
    ... This message contains confidential information and is ... If the reader of this ... message is not an intended recipient (or the individual ... result of e-mail transmission. ...
    (freebsd-stable)