Re: /var or /usr for data?
- From: CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:49:01 -0500
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
It would appear that the "proper" allocation of filesystems on FreeBSD is
to put all data in /usr. I'm used to this and have been doing it for
years.
my favourite "proper" allocation is to make ONE partition (/) and
nothing more. and forget all problems about how to partition your drive
right...
With a single, large filesystem on /, you cannot take advantage of
things like background fsck, cuz / always needs to be checked fully
before the system goes multiuser.
A small / partition is quick to fsck, and can be kept mounted sync to
ensure consistency without harming system throughput. All the others
(/var, /usr, /foo) can be checked after the machine is live, greatly
speeding up post-crash recovery.
--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
<CyberLeo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- /var or /usr for data?
- From: Brad Waite
- Re: /var or /usr for data?
- From: Wojciech Puchar
- /var or /usr for data?
- Prev by Date: RE: How to block 200K ip addresses?
- Next by Date: RE: Do I need to recompile my standard kernel to enable ipfw?
- Previous by thread: Re: /var or /usr for data?
- Next by thread: Re: /var or /usr for data?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|