Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- From: Jonathan Horne <freebsd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:53:39 -0600
On Sunday 30 December 2007 05:27:15 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
Yes, ULE is the recommended scheduler.
out of curiosity, if the ULE is becoming the standard, then why does the
GENERIC config still have the 4BSD as the default?
im curious to know, since im rebuilding a badly-behaving 7.0-RC1 box that was
locking up under the loads of building kernel. (installed at BETA4, now
building up to RC1 as i type...)
cheers,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
freebsd@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- Prev by Date: rc.resume and rc.suspend not executed on 6.2-RELEASE with acpi
- Next by Date: Re: healthd
- Previous by thread: rc.resume and rc.suspend not executed on 6.2-RELEASE with acpi
- Next by thread: Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- Index(es):