Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:10:15 +0100
Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2007 05:27:15 am Kris Kennaway wrote:Yes, ULE is the recommended scheduler.
out of curiosity, if the ULE is becoming the standard, then why does the GENERIC config still have the 4BSD as the default?
Release engineers wanted to be conservative in case of problems. It will change post-release.
im curious to know, since im rebuilding a badly-behaving 7.0-RC1 box that was locking up under the loads of building kernel. (installed at BETA4, now building up to RC1 as i type...)
Sounds likely to be hardware failure, absent other evidence.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- From: Jonathan Horne
- Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- Prev by Date: Re: healthd
- Next by Date: gui system information apps
- Previous by thread: Re: 7B4 scheduling question
- Next by thread: gui system information apps
- Index(es):
