Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- From: "millueradfa@xxxxxxxxx" <millueradfa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:16:52 -0800 (PST)
--- "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 07:32:16 schriebJason C. Wells:
use swap files?Norberto Meijome wrote:
But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to
that as swap. That wayOne could mount an md filesystem and then use
plus, the performanceyou wouldn't need to use any disc space. As a
md system is backed up bywould be way better than disc.
Ahem, sorry, that's just plain stupid. Either the
RAM (in which case you don't need the swap anyway;why'd you want to access
RAM by putting it in a swap on an md in RAM?), orit's backed up by swap, in
which case you have a chicken and egg problem.
Mmm, yes. That is quite a pickle. But a chicken or
an egg would still
be inferior to an md backed swap. :)
Regards,
Jason
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
Actually, you can have file backed swap files. I have
done it. However, with more than one swap file, or a
swap file and a swap partition on the same disk, there
ends up being quite a bit of thrashing. This is due
apparently to some interaction between having two
swaps on the same disk but that is jut a guess, i dont
know what the cause is.
The idea behind having swap files is that swap space
can more easily be expanded and added on the fly. If
your initial swap partition was not big enough it is
more easy to more swap in another file. As well, a
swap file that can grow and shrink, also would allow
you to avoid having a lot of disk space consumed by
unused swap, so he disk space is allocated when
needed, or allow more space to easily be added if you
find out you do not have enough.
With applications crashing because of swap partition
running out, this would be an important feature, since
more swap space can be allocated in a file which is
easier to do than a partition.
Swap is still important on systems with small amounts
of RAM, FreeBSD should be able to run on some older
hardware too and should not be like Windows where you
have to have 2 GHZ 2 GB of ram to run it. dynamic swap
space makes it more versatile which is a good thing
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- From: Jerry McAllister
- Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- References:
- Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- From: Jason C. Wells
- Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: why does linux-base-f7 exist if the binary compatibility is to a kernel too old to run it? (and how to change that?)
- Next by Date: Re: why does linux-base-f7 exist if the binary compatibility is to a kernel too old to run it? (and how to change that?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|