Re: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server?
- From: vogelke+software@xxxxxxxxx (Karl Vogel)
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:46:37 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:31:35 +0200 (CEST),
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
W> but why you need [a filesystem for linux that do checksum on the fly]?! all
W> PATA/SATA drives do checksumming on every read. in hardware, no CPU load.
These days, hardware isn't just hardware. A disk drive can have around
300,000 lines of low-level firmware, and who wants to bet that it's
completely bug-free? Silent-write errors are actually a big problem:
http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/2008-06/openpdfs/bairavasundaram.pdf
An Analysis of Data Corruption in the Storage Stack
"In this paper, we present the first large-scale study of data corruption.
We analyze corruption instances recorded in production storage systems
containing a total of 1.53 million disk drives, over a period of 41 months.
We study three classes of corruption: checksum mismatches, identity
discrepancies, and parity inconsistencies. We focus on checksum mismatches
since they occur the most; more than 400,000 instances of checksum
mismatches over the 41-month period."
--
Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company
Mangled song lyric: Looks like tomatoes
Actual lyric: Looks like we made it. (Barry Mannilow)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server?
- From: Wojciech Puchar
- Re: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server?
- Prev by Date: Re: md devices mounted with async
- Next by Date: Re: md devices mounted with async
- Previous by thread: Re: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server?
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|