Re: gmirror THEN geli, correct?
- From: Oliver Fromme <olli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:22:35 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Modulok <modulok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm looking for a confirmation on the order: When setting up a (root
partiton) gmirror+geli, what is the propper order? e.g: gmirror the
disks and THEN initialize geli on the /dev/mirror partitions? Is this
yes it is right order.
No, there is no "right" or "wrong" order. It depends on
what features of gmirror and geli you want to exploit.
See my more detailed explanation in this thread.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"Unix gives you just enough rope to hang yourself --
and then a couple of more feet, just to be sure."
-- Eric Allman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: gmirror THEN geli, correct?
- From: Wojciech Puchar
- Re: gmirror THEN geli, correct?
- Prev by Date: bsnmpd
- Next by Date: Re: bsnmpd
- Previous by thread: Re: gmirror THEN geli, correct?
- Next by thread: Re: Question about forcing fsck at boottime
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|