Re: ipnat port-range
- From: Patrick Lamaizière <patfbsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 23:05:44 +0200
Le Sun, 17 May 2009 16:16:51 -0400,
alexus <alexus@xxxxxxxxx>:
i dont see how things are obvious for you as they not so obvious for
me. first of all my ipf default policy to allow everything.
so the original question is for ipnat and not for ipf
now for non-passive (active) i put in these rules
rdr bce0 0/0 port ftp-data -> lama port ftp-data tcp
rdr bce0 0/0 port ftp -> lama port ftp tcp
and for pasv i still dont know what to do
i've tried
rdr bce0 0/0 port 49152-65534 -> lama port 65534
and in my ftp i said that this is range for pasv connections
I don't think there is a way to redirect a ports ranges to a ports
range with ipnat. For my ftp server I redirect each port (I use 30000
to 30039 for FTP) with a rule:
rdr vr0 0.0.0.0/0 port 21 -> 192.168.1.4 port 21
rdr vr0 0.0.0.0/0 port 30000 -> 192.168.1.4 port 30000
rdr vr0 0.0.0.0/0 port 30001 -> 192.168.1.4 port 30001
...
rdr vr0 0.0.0.0/0 port 30038 -> 192.168.1.4 port 30038
rdr vr0 0.0.0.0/0 port 30039 -> 192.168.1.4 port 30039
For ipnat see
http://www.westworks.ch/~chris/netbsd/NetBSD-NAT-FTP-server.html
Regards.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ipnat port-range
- From: alexus
- Re: ipnat port-range
- References:
- ipnat port-range
- From: alexus
- Re: ipnat port-range
- From: alexus
- Re: ipnat port-range
- From: Odhiambo ワシントン
- Re: ipnat port-range
- From: Roger Olofsson
- Re: ipnat port-range
- From: alexus
- ipnat port-range
- Prev by Date: Re: ipnat port-range
- Next by Date: Re: ipnat port-range
- Previous by thread: Re: ipnat port-range
- Next by thread: Re: ipnat port-range
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|