Re: Some GMirror questions.
- From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:31:58 -0500
I think you are making this harder than is needs to be. When in doubt defer
to the Handbook and the man pages. This also a good page
http://onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html
Lastly, I know at one point the 'load' algorithm had some performance
problems and people were saying to only use 'round-robin'. It seems as
though some code was committed back in Dec 2009 to fix it's this. Is there a
practical rule of thumb to using 'load' vs 'round-robin'?
Use load. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113885
Is this an accurate way to look at it?
"Round-robin because if you have two disks in a mirror, they’re both under
the same 'load' constraints, and it is best to KISS."
No. round-robin is a simple algorithm which alternates drive requests. Also
two identical HD's may be mirrored but they will not really ever be same
state in terms of caching, performance, etc.
--
Adam Vande More
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Some GMirror questions.
- From: Peter Clark
- Some GMirror questions.
- Prev by Date: Re: bash instead of csh (completely)
- Next by Date: Re: bash instead of csh (completely)
- Previous by thread: Some GMirror questions.
- Next by thread: [sterling@camdensoftware.com: Re: ncurses]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|