Re: qmail or postfix?
- From: John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Feb 2011 15:14:38 -0000
I like qmail, but I would, having written a book about it.
If you want something that works reasonably well out of the
box, I'd use Postfix. If you want something you can tweak to
do whatever you want, qmail is more of a toolkit.
Don't use the version of qmail in ports, it includes way too many
sloppily written patches. netqmail 1.06 is a reasonable place to
start.
http://qmail.org/netqmail/
I've replaced the qmail SMTP daemon with Bruce Guenter's mailfront,
which is in the ports collection. It has a flexible plugin design
which I've used to do better logging, spamassassin and DCC during the
SMTP session, etc.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- qmail or postfix?
- From: Alessandro Baggi
- qmail or postfix?
- Prev by Date: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config
- Next by Date: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: qmail or postfix?
- Next by thread: Re: qmail or postfix?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
