Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 01:51:14 -0500
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:04 AM, jb <jb.1234abcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If so, should FreeBSD adopt NetBSD's MM subsys, or just improve itself
surgically ?
You ought first establish there is a problem. What you have cited is
recently reinvigorated trend that has taken on the air of the "BDS is
dying" troll. What you have is a set of computer users with no
understanding of kernel internals attempting to diagnose some sort of
possibly legitimate problem by reaching conclusion via rumor and
guesswork. These people can be taken about as seriously as those who
insist the moon landing was fake and other bizarre ignorant pseudo-science.
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/19036310553/two-things-that-really-helped-speed-up-my-mac-and
http://dywypi.org/2012/02/back-on-linux.html
When you have a test case illustrating your feared FreeBSD VM shortcomings,
you may at that point begin to attract developer interest.
--
Adam Vande More
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: Michael Powell
- Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: jb
- Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- References:
- FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: jb
- Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: Chuck Swiger
- Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: jb
- Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- From: jb
- FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- Prev by Date: getty + cu, blocking mode, dialout
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- Previous by thread: Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
- Index(es):