Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- From: "UNIX developer @ Google.com" <developerunix@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:13:09 +0300
Ok, I understud!
I remove from rc.conf this rows:
static_routes="clnet"
route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"
new rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
gateway_enable="YES"
now after reboot the problem still the same.
ping -S 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) from 192.168.2.1: 56 data bytes
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.1.1 UGS 0 38 em0
127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.1.0/24 link#1 U 0 1153 em0
192.168.1.10 link#1 UHS 0 6 lo0
192.168.2.0/24 link#2 U 0 0 em1
192.168.2.1 link#2 UHS 0 6 lo0
Where more can be trouble?
-------------
Вы писали 22 июня 2012 г., 0:56:49:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:59:36 -0500, UNIX developer @ Google.com
<developerunix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
/etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
gateway_enable="YES"
static_routes="clnet"
route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"
You simply CANNOT do this. Traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 is bound to em1 and
cannot be changed. You setup a static route that basically says "to find
192.168.2.0/24, don't use em1 but instead ask 192.168.1.10 how to find it"?
This makes no sense at all.
--
С уважением,
UNIX mailto:developerunix@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- From: Alexandre
- Re: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- References:
- Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- From: UNIX developer @ Google.com
- Re: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- From: Mark Felder
- Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Robotics or embedded or hardware programming... what is this called?
- Next by Date: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|