"da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Hi,
I was fortunate enough to buy USB 3.0 pendrive,
which actually works with FreeBSD just ripped from
package! (normal _empty_ FAT filesystem, no
garbageware added, no need to format).
It actually bounces from 40MB/s limit when reading
from it.
Writing is about 18MB/s.
Device is supposed to be "467x" which should
be about 70MB/s.
And USB 2.0 hard limit is 60MB/s.
Wouldn't be nice to squeeze few additional
MB/s?
--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- From: Wojciech Puchar
- Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- From: Adam Vande More
- Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- From: Wojciech Puchar
- Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- From: Jakub Lach
- Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- Prev by Date: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
- Next by Date: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
- Previous by thread: mpd5+igb+9.1prerelease = lag with "youtube HD 1080"
- Next by thread: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
