Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable

From: Bill Moran (wmoran_at_potentialtech.com)
Date: 05/25/03

  • Next message: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
    Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 17:03:59 -0400
    To: Xavier de Labouret <zezaz@chez.com>
    
    

    Xavier de Labouret wrote:
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I would like to follow 4-stable on my FreeBSD box, and i can't fetch
    > binaries from /stand/sysinstall. Can anyone help me?
    >
    > Here is how i did:
    >
    > 1) I installed 4.8-RELEASE from CD,
    > 2) I used cvsup to upgrade. For this i used the stable-supfile as shown
    > in the Handbook.
    >
    > => My OS version as shown by 'uname -a' and '/stand/sysinstall' is
    > "4.8-STABLE".
    >
    > It looks like "4.8-STABLE" is slightly different from "4-STABLE": my
    > problem is, i can't install up-to-date packaged binaries with this release.
    > (Precision: I know i could recompile everything manually from ports,
    > but, as i like many gory like mozilla, gnome, openoffice... it would
    > take many days dedicated to recompilation on my single PC.)
    >
    > So, i tried to upgrade from within '/stand/sysinstall' by FTP.
    >
    > - First, it complained that it can't find the "4.8-STABLE" distribution
    > on my FTP source (which can be any FreeBSD server or mirror)
    > - So, i tried to force the Release Version in the Options menu to
    > 4-STABLE. No more luck, same error message...
    > - As the error message suggested me to put "any" in the Release Version
    > in the Options, i tried to. The error message got different then
    > ("unable to get packages/INDEX from selected media"). But it kept
    > unsuccessful.
    >
    > I am a little puzzled, because i feel like i followed the instructions,
    > but it does not work as expected. I must have missed something. But what?
    >
    > Thank you in advance for showing me what i did wrong!

    Packages are built for releases. To build packages for every possible
    snapshot of stable is impossible.

    If you want to install packages, change the option in sysinstall to
    4.8-RELEASE. This is _not_ guaranteed to work (and is less likely the
    further your -STABLE is from -RELEASE) but in my experience it works
    fine almost all of the time.

    What you _should_ do is build everything from ports. I understand your
    argument about the time involved, but it's the price you pay for staying
    -STABLE.

    If you're trying to track a reliable version, you'd be better off tracking
    the 4.8 branch (i.e. RELENG_4_8 in supfile). You'll still have to tweak
    sysinstall to say 4.8-RELEASE in order to get packages installed, but you're
    much less likely to have _any_ problems.

    -- 
    Bill Moran
    Potential Technologies
    http://www.potentialtech.com
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Getting started with FreeBSD
      ... My opinion of FreeBSD is do not try to configure X-11 desktops and apps with it. ... the relationship between ports, packages and security. ... You can install the same metapackage in any Unix OS, if you love the bloat--uh, I mean functionality--or use another DE/WM to navigate around your desktop. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Getting started with FreeBSD
      ... Since you are already knowledgeable of X-11 apps on slackware, this opinion may not concern you. ... My opinion of FreeBSD is do not try to configure X-11 desktops and apps with it. ... the relationship between ports, packages and security. ... I am currently using firefox 1.5.0.1, which I keep seeing online is ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: [OT] Re: What Linux distribution to choose for learning Ruby and Ruby on Rails
      ... integrate gems in the package management system on *BSD? ... If you want all the gory details (and a sample of that great FreeBSD ... the FreeBSD administration is more consistant across software packages, ... usually next to indestructible in a server configuration. ...
      (comp.lang.ruby)
    • Re: Getting started with FreeBSD
      ... Since you are already knowledgeable of X-11 apps on slackware, ... built on FreeBSD 6.x and keeps the base enough as in the FreeBSD.org ... the relationship between ports, packages and security. ... I am currently using firefox 1.5.0.1, which I keep seeing online is ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Total Newbie
      ... manage than Linux systems. ... And that however painful rebuilding very big and complex ports may be at ... through providing mainly prebuilt packages ... FreeBSD is much more open about the choice. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)