Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable
From: Elden Fenison (efbsd_at_moondog.org)
Date: 05/26/03
- Previous message: Jukka Huvinen: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- In reply to: Jukka Huvinen: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Next in thread: Andy Farkas: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Reply: Andy Farkas: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 00:36:11 -0700 To: Jukka Huvinen <jhuvinen@cc.hut.fi>
* Jukka Huvinen [05/26/2003 09:38]:
> If I update the ports collection with cvsup, it becomes to "current".
> (tag=.) I think there is no alternative, tag=RELENG_4 does not fetch
> the tree.
The ports tree is always -CURRENT (tag=.). It should be fine for general
use with either -RELEASE or -STABLE.
-- -=Elden=- http://www.moondog.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jukka Huvinen: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- In reply to: Jukka Huvinen: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Next in thread: Andy Farkas: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Reply: Andy Farkas: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]