Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable
From: Andy Farkas (andyf_at_speednet.com.au)
Date: 05/27/03
- Previous message: Doug Barton: "Re: Problem with bind8 and ports"
- In reply to: Elden Fenison: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smorgrav: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:18:02 +1000 (EST) To: Elden Fenison <efbsd@moondog.org>
On Mon, 26 May 2003, Elden Fenison wrote:
> * Jukka Huvinen [05/26/2003 09:38]:
> > If I update the ports collection with cvsup, it becomes to "current".
> > (tag=.) I think there is no alternative, tag=RELENG_4 does not fetch
> > the tree.
>
> The ports tree is always -CURRENT (tag=.). It should be fine for general
> use with either -RELEASE or -STABLE.
You can cvsup a ports tree from any major release by using
`ports-all tag=RELEASE_x_y_z`.
--
:{ andyf@speednet.com.au
Andy Farkas
System Administrator
Speednet Communications
http://www.speednet.com.au/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Doug Barton: "Re: Problem with bind8 and ports"
- In reply to: Elden Fenison: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smorgrav: "Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
