Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8
From: John Bäckstrand (sandos_at_home.se)
Date: 06/27/03
- Previous message: Makoto Matsushita: "Re: Is there something sppecial about pass4 ?"
- In reply to: Eugene Grosbein: "Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8"
- Next in thread: John Bäckstrand: "Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Eugene Grosbein" <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 03:16:04 +0200
> > From this it sounds as it is a problem that should
be
> > fixed, but it
> > obviously isnt in 4.8. Is this behaviour now
considered
> > acceptable? And if
> > so, doesnt this make FreeBSD extremely easy to kill
> > using a simple
> > DOS-attack? Is this "fixed" in any way on 5.1?
>
> Afaik, this bug was recently fixed in both of HEAD
and STABLE.
>
> Eugene
Yes, you could well be right. The fix about not
checking return values from m_copy() when receiving
broadcast messages I think, sure seems to fit what is
happening to me. I disconnected my three machines from
the rest of the LAN, and tried exhausting mbuf clusters
again. This time, it didnt hang, and no rl0 watchdog
messages either. I am ugprading the box now and will
try a new kernel.
--- John Bäckstrand _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Makoto Matsushita: "Re: Is there something sppecial about pass4 ?"
- In reply to: Eugene Grosbein: "Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8"
- Next in thread: John Bäckstrand: "Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]