Re: unionfs related patch

From: Alexandr Kovalenko (never_at_nevermind.kiev.ua)
Date: 09/01/03

  • Next message: Alexandr Kovalenko: "Re: unionfs related patch" 
    Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 19:00:43 +0300
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>

    Hello, Alexandr Kovalenko!

    On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:19:27AM +0300, you wrote:

    > > David Schultz, in his spare time, has been working through some of the
    > > issues I've been able to 'tweak' in the unionfs code ... as he is
    > > currently working on forward-patching it to -CURRENT right now, he can't
    > > commit the code to the -STABLE tree ... in order to allow others using
    > > unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very
    > > heavily loaded system), with his permission, I've posted the patch for
    > > download at:
    > >
    > > http://www.hub.org/~scrappy/unionfs
    >
    > Looks like it pretty stable. I'm running ~10 days with this patch - no
    > even single panic. Thank you!

    I was too optimistic. It panics on high loads after 3-10 days.
    Is there any progress in work on this patch? 

    -- 
NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food
Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group
http://uafug.org.ua/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Alexandr Kovalenko: "Re: unionfs related patch"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: unionfs related patch
      ... > unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very ... > heavily loaded system), with his permission, I've posted the patch for ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: [RFC]selinux: Improving SELinux read/write performance
      ... This patch improves performance of read/write in SELinux. ... It improves performance by skipping permission check in ... changed or the policy has changed since the open-time check. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
      ... unlike before with the full patch ... Meanwhile, on the side, I have a couple of permission problems to ... You can see it is not complaining about all the fd's of a task, ... It was the 8th patch on my stack when I submitted it. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: problems with patch ms01-044
      ... One of the earlier patches for the WebDav vulnerabilities ... sets the permission on this file to "Everyone DENY". ... For this new patch to install, just reset the permission by REMOVING the ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • Re: permission() bug?
      ... > the fix for permission() that makes it compliant with POSIX.1-2001 ... Here is the patch I sent before. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)