Re: testers needed for CAM INVARIANTS fix
From: Kenneth D. Merry (ken_at_kdm.org)
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:50:28 -0600 To: Maxim Konovalov <email@example.com>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:46:16 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, 16:13-0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > I've got a fix for the panic from the cd(4)/da(4) drivers when INVARIANTS
> > is turned on in -stable.
> > The fix is to create a task queue that runs in a thread context and use
> > that to create the sysctl variables needed by cd(4) and da(4). The
> > eventual fix will be to move the CAM transport layer probe code into a
> > kernel thread.
> > Anyway, these patches work for me, but if I could get some feedback from
> > people running with INVARIANTS turned on in -stable, I'd appreciate it.
> > If it seems to work for people, I'll talk to re@ about getting this in
> > before 4.9 goes out the door.
> It seems it works. I am running my usuall stress tests now, thanks a
> lot. patch(1)-friendly diff is there:
Thanks for testing it.
I just committed the -current version of the above patches, I'll work on
getting into -stable now.
-- Kenneth Merry firstname.lastname@example.org _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org"