Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8).

From: Ceri Davies (setantae_at_submonkey.net)
Date: 09/19/03

  • Next message: Chris Pressey: "Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8)."
    Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:53:49 +0100
    To: Chris Pressey <cpressey@catseye.mine.nu>
    
    
    

    On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:51:44AM -0700, Chris Pressey wrote:
    > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:48:02 -0700
    > Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote:
    >
    > > Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
    > >
    > > > As mentioned by Tom's original mail that isn't possible due to the
    > > > qmail license. You can go bug djb about it :-) (though I doubt it
    > > > will change anything).
    > > >
    > > > Note, the license is the reason why qmail isn't included, it's not a
    > > > crusade against qmail - I also use qmail myself some places.
    > >
    > > Note: in my view the problem is that the current port maintainer
    > > has decided to produce an install that is not conformant with
    > > Dan's license granting an exception to the requirement for his
    > > approval. It is entirely possible to make a binary package that
    > > either: meets with his approval, or; fulfills the requirements
    > > for the exemption.
    >
    > I quite agree. Quoting http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html :
    >
    > "You are permitted to distribute a precompiled var-qmail package if (1)
    > installing the package produces exactly the same /var/qmail hierarchy as
    > a user would obtain by downloading, compiling, and installing
    > qmail-1.03.tar.gz, fastforward-0.51.tar.gz, and dot-forward-0.71.tar.gz;
    > (2) the package behaves correctly, i.e., the same way as normal
    > qmail+fastforward+dot-forward installations on all other systems; and
    > (3) the package's creator warrants that he has made a good-faith attempt
    > to ensure that the package behaves correctly."
    >
    > Frankly I'd be surprised if a package built straight from the qmail port
    > didn't meet these requirements.

    If I installed a package that put itself in /var simply because the guy who
    wrote it says that's where it should be (on my system!), then I wouldn't be
    best pleased. Enough said.

    Ceri

    -- 
    User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR?
    Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment.
                                               -- www.chatterboxchallenge.com
    
    



  • Next message: Chris Pressey: "Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8)."

    Relevant Pages

    • Errors applying kernel patch 118833-36
      ... install of Solaris 10 11/06. ... However, once the package list is done, I see a worrisome message: ... Below is the complete console output of the patch run. ... Changes for package SUNWnfsskr will not be applied to the system. ...
      (SunManagers)
    • Re: media player 10 setup issues
      ... Finished building install list. ... Package 'MPPRE' is version '10.0.0.3802'. ... Install for Exception pack ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsmedia)
    • Re: A little help please!
      ... This so far was the best map to getting DVD media working I am going to ... Also I have the latest libdvdcss2 and libdvdcss2-dev installed. ... sudo aptitude install totem-xine ... Click either free or non-free depending on where the package you ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: Code correctness, and testing strategies
      ... automate the testing a bit more. ... the shell scripts & control files work correctly, that the debian ... package had all the files in the correct places etc). ... Install the package under a chroot ...
      (comp.lang.python)
    • Re: Reinstall WMP10 & WMP11 fail
      ... Windows Media Development Team ... Finished building install list. ... Package 'MPPRE' is version '10.0.0.3802'. ... Parsing CustomDestination INFSection:'WMP.Destination' ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player)