How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?
From: Brett Glass (brett_at_lariat.org)
Date: 10/29/03
- Previous message: Alexander Kabaev: "Re: ubsa, ucom Problems"
- Next in thread: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Erick Mechler: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: zen: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Allen Landsidel: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Richard Coleman: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:41:37 -0700 (MST) To: stable@freebsd.org
We need immediate feedback on the stability of FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. (Yes, I
know, people are just starting to download it now.) We want and need some of
the important fixes that went into -STABLE in the past month (including vital
upates to IPFW2), but can't afford to put a release that's not absolutely
solid on a production system. (For the same reason, we probably won't go to
5.x until 5.3.) The comment in the release notes suggesting that conservative
users stick with 4.8-RELEASE is not encouraging. If 4.9 isn't stable, we may
be forced to jump over to OpenBSD 3.4 for new production systems.
Will there be a 4.9.1 if there are serious problems in 4.9?
--Brett Glass
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alexander Kabaev: "Re: ubsa, ucom Problems"
- Next in thread: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Erick Mechler: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: zen: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Allen Landsidel: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Reply: Richard Coleman: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|