Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?
From: Julien Gabel (jpeg_at_thilelli.net)
Date: 10/29/03
- Previous message: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- In reply to: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Next in thread: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:42 +0100 (CET) To: "Maxim Konovalov" <maxim@macomnet.ru>
>> users stick with 4.8-RELEASE is not encouraging. If 4.9 isn't stable, we
>> may be forced to jump over to OpenBSD 3.4 for new production systems.
Regarding the recent paper "Benchmarking BSD and Linux", which results can
be found at http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/, I don't know if it is a good
idea to prefer OpenBSD - even the 3.4 - over FreeBSD.
-- -jg. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- In reply to: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Next in thread: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|