Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?

From: zen (zen_at_tk-pttuntex.com)
Date: 10/30/03

  • Next message: Wes Peters: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?" 
    Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 08:20:32 +0700
To: stable@freebsd.org

    Hello Brett,

    Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 11:41:37 PM, you wrote:

    > We need immediate feedback on the stability of FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. (Yes, I
    > know, people are just starting to download it now.) We want and need some of
    > the important fixes that went into -STABLE in the past month (including vital
    > upates to IPFW2), but can't afford to put a release that's not absolutely
    > solid on a production system. (For the same reason, we probably won't go to
    > 5.x until 5.3.) The comment in the release notes suggesting that conservative
    > users stick with 4.8-RELEASE is not encouraging. If 4.9 isn't stable, we may
    > be forced to jump over to OpenBSD 3.4 for new production systems.

    > Will there be a 4.9.1 if there are serious problems in 4.9?

    it's stable enough for me. we plant to upgrade all servers to 4.9
    STABLE ASAP. 

    -- 
Best regards,
 zen                            mailto:zen@tk-pttuntex.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Wes Peters: "Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?"

    Relevant Pages