Re: [SOLVED] RE: [Backtrace] 4.9 and 5.1-RELEASE occasionly panic
From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov (dmitry_at_atlantis.dp.ua)
Date: 12/25/03
- Previous message: Thorsten Steentjes: "Re: possible (kernel) bug with zebra"
- Next in thread: Sten: "Re: [SOLVED] RE: [Backtrace] 4.9 and 5.1-RELEASE occasionly panic"
- Reply: Sten: "Re: [SOLVED] RE: [Backtrace] 4.9 and 5.1-RELEASE occasionly panic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:58:37 +0200 (EET) To: stable@freebsd.org
Hello!
> From: Sten <sten@blinkenlights.nl>
>
> I'd really love getting rid of most hardcoded memory allocations
> in the fbsd kernel, with the main bugger being NMBCLUSTERS,
> which one always forgets about untill it's too late :(.
> In solaris auto-tuning has been a top priority for a long while,
> and propper dynamic tuning should get it right ( or even better )
> in 99% of the cases. People with other needs should be able
> to build a custom kernel.
You need _not_ to build custom FreeBSD kernel in order to increase
NMBCLUSTERS. Both CURRENT and STABLE allows setting it from loader.conf:
kern.ipc.nmbufs="32768" # Number of mbufs
kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" # Number of mbuf clusters
But yes, you have to reboot your system if you want to raise them.
Sincerely, Dmitry
-- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Thorsten Steentjes: "Re: possible (kernel) bug with zebra"
- Next in thread: Sten: "Re: [SOLVED] RE: [Backtrace] 4.9 and 5.1-RELEASE occasionly panic"
- Reply: Sten: "Re: [SOLVED] RE: [Backtrace] 4.9 and 5.1-RELEASE occasionly panic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|