Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?

From: Pete French (petefrench_at_keithprowse.com)
Date: 01/14/04

  • Next message: John Kennedy: "Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?" 
    To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@keithprowse.com, veldy@veldy.net
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000

    > No. Use
    >
    > tag = .

    Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than the
    tree as it was at the point when 5.2 RELEASE was created ?

    -pcf.
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: John Kennedy: "Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
      ... > Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than the ... DES ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Download the whole ports tree
      ... I would like to do is grab a copy of the whole freeBSD ports tree while I ... free space etc etc, or just a copy of one branch like www??? ... Prev by Date: ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Pruning the Ports Tree
      ... > Is it alright to prune the Ports tree - and still do updates later. ... People telling cvsup to refuse chunks of the ... now that you can just grab a freshly build INDEX ... you can't increase the number of inodes on a filesystem ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Pnmscale on 4.8 i386 stable
      ... grab the ports tree is not feasible for you -- it's only about 275Mb ... In both of these cases, you need to install the dependencies first, ...
      (freebsd-questions)