Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?
From: Marc G. Fournier (scrappy_at_hub.org)
Date: 02/24/04
- Previous message: John Merryweather Cooper: "Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: Macromedia FLASH ..."
- In reply to: Phil Rosenthal: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:58:35 -0400 (AST) To: Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com>
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> I haven't touched the VM_KMEM_SIZE/VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX options, however.
> Reading the LINT notes, this seems unrelated... Are you sure that's a
> necessary change?
Honestly, its been so long now that I'm not 100% certain exactly what I
was addressing with the VM_KMEM_* stuff ... I do alot on our servers with
unionfs, which tends to require some settings to be increased (ie. vnodes)
to quite high values ... I *think* I raised KVA_PAGES *because* I needed
to raise VM_KMEM_SIZE* to accommodate those increases ... but, again, it
was ages ago ...
---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: John Merryweather Cooper: "Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: Macromedia FLASH ..."
- In reply to: Phil Rosenthal: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]