Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?
From: Doug White (dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com)
Date: 02/24/04
- Previous message: Vulpes Velox: "Re: Can't kill process"
- In reply to: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Next in thread: Gerrit Nagelhout: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:03:23 -0800 (PST) To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>
> > I haven't touched the VM_KMEM_SIZE/VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX options, however.
> > Reading the LINT notes, this seems unrelated... Are you sure that's a
> > necessary change?
>
> Honestly, its been so long now that I'm not 100% certain exactly what I
> was addressing with the VM_KMEM_* stuff ... I do alot on our servers with
> unionfs, which tends to require some settings to be increased (ie. vnodes)
> to quite high values ... I *think* I raised KVA_PAGES *because* I needed
> to raise VM_KMEM_SIZE* to accommodate those increases ... but, again, it
> was ages ago ...
Something else you might try, in lieu of these changes, is to drop
maxusers to 128. This frees up a lot of KVM. The auto-sizer maxes out at
512MB, and past 1GB the page tables start consuming a non-trivial amount
of memory.
If you need to increase maxfiles or mbufs, you can tweak those manually
using loader and/or sysctl.
-- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Vulpes Velox: "Re: Can't kill process"
- In reply to: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Next in thread: Gerrit Nagelhout: "Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]