Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?
From: Bob Bishop (rb_at_gid.co.uk)
Date: 02/26/04
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Testers needed: Joe's MFC of USB code"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:26:26 +0000 To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Hi,
At 18:25 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>One of the EM nics we just got in comes up with
>
>em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.19> port
>0x9000-0x903f mem 0xe8700000-0xe871ffff,0xe86e0000-0xe86fffff irq 5 at
>device 0.0 on pci1
>em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
>em0: Unable to initialize the hardware
>device_probe_and_attach: em0 attach returned 5
>
>when booting. Is this just a dud or just not recognized ?
FWIW I get something very similar under 5.2.1-RC2 on my shiny new ThinkPad
T41, so it's likely just not recognised.
-- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Testers needed: Joe's MFC of USB code"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|