Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?

From: Bob Bishop (rb_at_gid.co.uk)
Date: 02/26/04

  • Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Testers needed: Joe's MFC of USB code" 
    Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:14:07 +0000
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>

    At 19:57 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:

    >At 02:26 PM 26/02/2004, Bob Bishop wrote:
    >>Hi,
    >>
    >>At 18:25 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
    >>>
    >>>em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid [etc]
    >>
    >>FWIW I get something very similar under 5.2.1-RC2 on my shiny new
    >>ThinkPad T41, so it's likely just not recognised.
    >
    >Actually, I worked around the problem by swapping its location with an fxp
    >next to it. For some reason the em does not seem to like sharing its
    >interrupt with agp0 ? The fxp seems happy enough to do it however.

    Oh great. All the PCI devices on my TP are sharing int 11, but it all works
    fine under WinXP. Maybe I should try without ACPI... 

    --
Bob Bishop		    +44 (0)118 977 4017
rb@gid.co.uk		fax +44 (0)118 989 4254
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Testers needed: Joe's MFC of USB code"