Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?
From: Bob Bishop (rb_at_gid.co.uk)
Date: 02/29/04
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 49, Issue 7"
- Maybe in reply to: Mike Tancsa: "bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:00 +0000 To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Hi again,
At 19:57 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>At 02:26 PM 26/02/2004, Bob Bishop wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>At 18:25 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>>
>>>em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid [etc]
>>
>>FWIW I get something very similar under 5.2.1-RC2 on my shiny new
>>ThinkPad T41, so it's likely just not recognised.
>
>Actually, I worked around the problem by swapping its location with an fxp
>next to it. For some reason the em does not seem to like sharing its
>interrupt with agp0 ? The fxp seems happy enough to do it however.
On my T41, hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range="1" in /boot/loader.conf fixed
it, so maybe the IRQ wasn't the problem.
-- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 49, Issue 7"
- Maybe in reply to: Mike Tancsa: "bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
