Re: freebsd 4.9 stable tail wont CTRL C

From: Rumen Telbizov (altares_at_e-card.bg)
Date: 03/25/04

  • Next message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: ssh no longer connecting automatically" 
    Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:15:54 +0200
To: Ryan Pekarik <mhx@oplink.net>

    Hi,

    I also experience this problem since 4.9 was released
    and I upgraded my servers!

    The interesting part is that some of the applications
    does seem to receive the signal correct, e.g.
    ping some.host is interrupted with ctrl+c but
    tail -f file - is not.
    Ctr+Z is working well!

    The terminal type I use is: cons25w
    but the same behaviour is seen on cons25.
    The servers are 4.9-STABLE (cvsuped 2-3 weeks
    ago).

    Rumen Telbizov

    On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:25:18PM -0600, Ryan Pekarik wrote:
    > I've been upgrading a few servers to 4.9-STABLE recently.
    > Some of them via cvsup from older versions and some of
    > them via installing 4.9-RELEASE and then cvsuping to STABLE.
    >
    >
    > In both cases I cannot send ctrl+c through ssh!
    > If I am on the console there is no problem but if I am
    > through a ptty obviously ctrl+c does not send the
    > signal correctly.
    > E.g. if I do tail -f /some/file.log I can not terminate it!
    > Ctrl+Z works fine. Despite when my job is susspended
    > I cannot kill pid. Instead I have to kill -9 pid.
    >
    > any fixes?
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Ryan
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: ssh no longer connecting automatically"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Re: worthless activation
      ... >>servers, whats the point upgrading if it alredy works. ... Service Pack 2 is a big improvment on Win 3.01? ... What do you mean service pack instalments go ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
    • Re: upgrade NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 AD
      ... after upgrading the PDC introduce another server with a fresh w2k install ... Install fresh BDC, promote to PDC and upgrade it as win2k AD. ... Introduce two fresh installed W2K3 member servers to the domain and ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
    • Simple questions for 2000 to 2003 upgrade
      ... Just a few simple questions about upgrading our network to 2003. ... And another server running 2000 sp4 exchange sp4 ... The rest of our servers are member servers running 2000 sp4, ... We are just running Windows 2000 Standard, and Exchange 2000 Enterprise. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
    • Re: Migrating Windows 2003 to Dissimilair Hardware
      ... "Robbie Wallis" wrote in message ... > We are in the process of upgrading our hardware range which requires us to ... You'll probably save yourself a lot of trouble by installing W2K3 servers ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.setup)
    • RE: Upgrading W2K3 Server to MSXML SP2
      ... "Trent USTA" wrote: ... > between the IIS request to SQL and the response back to IIS. ... > I've been tasked with upgrading the web servers to SP2. ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db)