Is 4.10-BETA stable?
From: Dave Horsfall (dave_at_horsfall.org)
Date: 04/22/04
- Previous message: Marc Santhoff: "Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 57, Issue 3"
- Next in thread: Mike Maltese: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Mike Maltese: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Stefan Wessels Beljaars: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:58:32 +1000 (EST) To: FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, from 4.7
to (I thought) 4.9, by CVSuping RELENG_4 and "make buildworld" etc.
Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
Is this release considered stable? It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD
page. Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X instead?
Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
in for?
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Marc Santhoff: "Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 57, Issue 3"
- Next in thread: Mike Maltese: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Mike Maltese: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Stefan Wessels Beljaars: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|